5.+Assessment

// List any checkpoints that will provide students with formative feedback, with criteria for each. //
 * Formative Assessment: **


 * I will informally assess students while I visit with each group during their work time.
 * Students will submit the two Google Forms (Technology & Reasons for Exploration) online.
 * I will check the Wiki for information on a regular basis.
 * I will read and respond to the reflections at the end of the project.

Summative Assessment: // Provide the rubric that will assess the final product/presentation/event. //

 TOTAL SCORE:/16
 * PowerPoint || 0 || 1 || 2 || 3 || 4 || Score ||
 * Information || Missing all explorer Info || Lacks most information, not accurate, not appropriate || Explorer info is somewhat accurate and appropriate. Lacks little information || Explorer information is mostly accurate and appropriate || All required explorer info is accurate and appropriate ||  ||
 * Appearance || Didn’t even try || Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material || Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read || Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability. || Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content. ||  ||
 * Overall Work || Missing all work || Work is not completed on time and has errors || Work is not completed on time and has no errors || Work is completed on time with few errors || Work is completed on time with no errors ||  ||
 * Presentation || Did not present ||  || Student gave an okay presentation because of a lack of effort / content ||   || Student gave an excellent presentation of their explorer ||   ||